new_logo

Thinking Transite: Points A to Z

Technology Enables You to Be Positively Different

Hi,
 
This month, we were included in an article in Inbound Logistics, “Technology Enables You to Be Positively Different.” It was Q&A format:

 
How can logistics technologies be utilized as a competitive differentiator?

As a transportation management software company, we see shippers and 3PL’s urgently differentiating themselves because their respective markets are so crowded. Overall, companies prefer to attract customers by providing unique brand-driven customer experiences and services rather than compete on price. Strategic and practical use of the right technologies enables sharp pricing competitiveness, better customer experiences, reduces expenses and raises productivity.

What we are seeing in online retailing is an example. A few years ago, “shipping and handling” was a known profit center for online retailers—consumers bought product and paid to have it delivered. “Free shipping” was uncommon and typically offered by a handful of online retailers only during the holiday season. Times have changed with about 75% of the largest online retailers offered free shipping during the past holiday season. And, many retailers such as L.L. Bean and Target are now offering free shipping throughout the year, no restrictions.

Supply chain technologies enable such differentiations. In our example of online retailing, the logistics technologies have to dovetail into the entire supply chain structure, as online retailers must now specifically understand and manage transportation costs and quality level of carriers to be able to offer their customers transportation-based incentives.
2012-05-08 | 0 Comments
Thinking Transite: Points A to Z

Taking the Complexity Out of LTL Shipping

Hi,
Adrian Gonzalez of Logistics Viewpoints posted a column and podcast discussing “Taking the Complexity Out of LTL Shipping.”

During the podcast, Adrian interviewed Steve Pandolfo, director of pricing for Sunset Transportation, who talked about the challenges of working within the LTL space, and how technology influences the management of his function.

He offers the following example:

LTL is pretty confusing to break down and try to rate because of all the different [factors] that go into getting that final [rate]. Every carrier has what is called a rules tariff and those are how they break down the fees that [they] charge to shippers for things like notifying the consignee before [the shipment] delivers, if you have a lift gate, if the driver has to go inside somewhere and break the freight down…[and] it’s important for shippers to know that all these charges are different for every carrier, it’s not a [common] charge across the board, and those charges are increased, generally, on a year-by-year basis, so the [fee] you were charged in December could be completely different in January.

To read the column and listen to the podcast, please click here.
 

Thank you for reading and, as always, feel free to contact us at sales@transite.com if you have any questions.
 
2012-04-25 | 0 Comments
Reason #5
Better Customer Experience
Higher reliability and faster. With a network, there is higher latency and you are subject to network disruptions that you cannot control while your interfaces look like a true customer site that represents your hard-earned brand, and not a re-skinned UI of a third-party provider. The customer service and interaction you provide to your customers isn’t dependent on the third-party’s quality and reliability. Your are not dependent on the customer support service you get from your SaaS provider.
Reason#4
Cost
Often, a vendor who sells both will offer rent-to-own flexibility. TMS suppliers such as Transite have both SaaS, and purchase/install and a customer can typically use the SaaS version to see if the overall functionality meets the business needs. This reduces risk, enables the initial business need to be tackled while enabling you to take your time to evaluate and choose the best solution for the company. With purchase, there is a long-term lower Total Cost of Ownership, particularly with the steadily decreasing cost of hardware over the years. Although more is paid in the initial cost of premise software, with SaaS you are constantly paying for application fees, hosting fees, transaction fees, and license fees. And, like leasing a car, you never own anything.
 
Reason #3
Tighter Integration Model
Data is easily stored in a data warehouse for reporting, and doesn’t have to be accessed to a 3rd party company which can add slowness and reduce quality. Installed solutions fit in easily with ERPs and across the supply chain along with disaster recovery systems. Integrations with a SaaS TMS are well-known to be very expensive. This stems from the need to navigate restrictions by the vendor on access to the application, data, and communications limitations. Generally, a premise-based system costs much less to integrate with internal applications as well as customer applications & processes. For a logistics provider, this is critical.
Reason #2
You Control Your Data
The data is your’s forever and you have full access to the data. A fundamental disadvantage to a SaaS solution is you don’t have access to the database where your data is stored. This prevents other applications from interactively using this data, creating reports based on all the data, and even simply extending the database to meet your specific needs. You and your customers have a high sense of security: you have total control and privacy of the data with no need to disclose proprietary information to a third party. .
As previously mentioned, we'll discuss the five top reasons companies should consider a purchase/install solution instead of a SaaS model when looking at a Transportation Management System. Just for the record, we sell our TMS in either delivery models.
 
Reason #1
The Flexibility to Control Your Destiny
Your technology adapts to your business. As companies change and grow, sometimes technologies cannot scale to meet growing customer demands or don’t have the flexibility to help companies grow into new lines of business. SaaS services are therefore viewed as “tools” while purchase/install technologies have the ability to be more strategic weapons as they can drive market differentiation and business process improvements.
Happy New Year and we wish much success to you all!
We're off to a great start and based on our pipeline, it's evident that companies will continue to invest in transportation management software to reduce costs, improve efficiency, and help run their overall freight management functions more effectively.
I think it's important for software buyers to remember that companies can either purchase and install their TMS solution or obtain the functionality through the software as a service model—and, if they are a shipper, they can simply choose to outsource the whole thing to a third-party logistics provider.
SaaS TMS offerings have been advertised as inexpensive, quick to install, uncomplicated with no expensive hardware purchases, and few development costs.
But, in spite of the positive market reception around the on-demand (SaaS) model, we need to remind ourselves that there are sound business reasons to recognize when purchase-install makes the most sense.
In the coming posts, we'll write about the five top reasons companies should consider a purchase/install solution instead of a SaaS model.
So, keep visiting our site and join tour discusson. As always, feel free to contact us directly and we'll be happy to help you!

Hi,


This past week, we participated in an interview session with Adrian Gonzalez of Logistics Viewpoints. He was asking about the business value of “Flexibility” as related to TMS technology. As part of the podcast, he also interviewed Kyle Krug, director of client solutions for TMSi, a leading national 3PL and a customer of Transite’s.


The interview was well-conducted, with Adrian drawing key points from the participants. His interest and expertise regarding this issue is seen in numerous past columns.


One point that was called out in Adrian’s column was a comment from Kyle, who lead the TMS selection process for his company.

“The first thing we learned from experience is that TMS from a shipper’s standpoint and TMS from a 3PL’s standpoint are very different,” he said. “So, if you are a 3PL looking for a TMS you really need to make sure the [solution] is able to service the extra layers of needs [you have as a 3PL]…That seems kind of a simple thing, but it’s really not, there’s a lot to it, so I would really make sure you take that angle.”

To read the column and listen to the podcast, please click here.

Thank you for reading and, as always, feel free to contact us at sales@transite.com if you have any questions.

A recent posting on a Linkedin group discussion board asked, “Which TMS solutions are best suited for LTL carriers? Why?” While a question like this will probably draw its share of blatant vendor responses, we thought we’d try to offer some useful information. We offered the discussion leader a conversation on this topic—this is a simple question that has a complex answer. It can’t be properly addressed by reasonably brief written comments.
But for all of our readers, please know we like being part of the industry conversation and always welcome your questions and comments.

Just so you know, here’s our comment to the question:
 
Hi,
There are many TMS solutions on the market, each with strengths and weaknesses. However, the uniqueness of LTL actually provides clarity and priorities in looking at offerings. For example, the complexity of LTL pricing with detailed variables--accessorials, lane profitability/route management, and customer service delivery requirements, etc.—places a premium on the contract and pricing management capability of a TMS.

In LTL, “the devil is in the details” and contract management and pricing enables a LTL carrier to put forth competitive pricing while protecting margin and profitability. This, combined with multiple operational system requirements (route management, asset management, driver management, etc.) as well as customer facing technology such as a single carrier or a multi-carrier TMS, and it becomes readily apparent that the solution is really a combination of solutions.

Without taking up too much space or your time, please know there are many other important points that are examined regarding an LTL TMS selection. If you want to discuss by phone or via email, please contact me. And, I’ll also be happy to talk about how the requirements for what makes a great TMS for a shipper versus a carrier (or 3PL) can be very different.
 
Thanks for the discussion and I hope I’ve been of some help.
Transite recently made an announcement about its new white paper: Knowing When It’s Time for a New Transportation Management System. Although we didn’t promote our whitepaper beyond our routine manner, the response has been well above average. Shippers, 3PLs, consultants and others have been downloading the new white paper on our website.


Transite sees that TMS’s are a hot topic right now, and the response rate can be attributed to more people recognizing that TMS capabilities span beyond functionality. Transportation Management Systems are strategic tools that can be used to foster the growth of your businesses. An improving economy coupled with rising fuel prices are contributing to the interest in TMS’s.

We hope everyone who downloads the white paper finds it useful in determining the status of their current TMS and future transportation needs.
We exhibited at the 3PL Summit in Atlanta on Wednesday, June 22. The show was well organized and well run. Transite's booth fortunately saw healthy traffic. Shippers and 3PLs seemed reasonably optimistic about their businesses for the rest of the year.
 
Shows like this are great opportunities to learn about industry trends. It's also a good time to speak with prospects and current customers. We are looking forward to attending other shows this year such as the annual Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals conference this fall. We hope you'll stop by to see us!
Recently, our COO and head of client services had a chance to visit one of our 3PL customers for a feedback session regarding our products and customer support. Generally, we like to either visit or have a phone conversation with our customers to check in to make sure we’re all on the good footing. As we do a pretty good job of keeping track of customer support issues per client, we normally go into these conversations with a pretty good idea of areas of good performance and those that need improvement. The in-person visits are typically more insightful because we learn so much more about our customer’s experience with our company—and we get to know more about the people who are actually using our software. In this case, we were surprised when one particular unknown (to Transite) issue was raised. Because we weren’t limited to a phone call, we sat down and worked out a mutual plan to resolve the issue through better communication and deeper training. A few weeks ago, we conducted a customer survey to get feedback on our performance. These visits and calls are part of the same program to help us be a fantastic business partner. We welcome the feedback and that’s how we get better in our customer-driven business approach. Your thoughts are always welcome: info@transite.com

We’re just getting ready to go to NASSTRAC in Orlando after returning from TIA’s Annual Conference last week. As a company, we have to be pretty careful about what shows we attend and exhibit. They cost money and, for our show staff, it’s time away from the office and from home. But, we learn so much by being present at these industry events.

 

For example, at TIA/Orlando we had a chance to talk with many of our existing customers. As a company that places a premium on customer support/satisfaction, this opportunity is equal to developing new sales leads. Existing customers make us better because they are already using our products. So, their feedback is based on their real experiences—some of which are almost impossible to replicate or anticipate in our own technology center.

 

So, if you’re going to be at NASSTRAC next week, please stop by. If you’re a current customer, we always appreciate the chance to swap stories and get your input. If you’re kicking the tires in the transportation management systems market, we have some great solutions and products and would welcome the chance to tell a bit of our story.

 

You all come see us!

Last week, two of our employees, Gary and Pete, were travelling on business and were in an accident at highway speed. Aside from some soreness and minor scrapes, all involved were spared injury and they even made it to the customer meeting later that afternoon.

 

Transite enjoys being a small company. As people who work here, we’re a pretty tight crew. When our wayward travelers returned to the office, there was a great feeling among us as we were just happy and relieved that they were well. We had an impromptu meeting as we wanted to hear about their adventure and welcome them back.

 

So many companies use the phrase, “our employees are our greatest asset.” For us, this event delivered a chance to regain perspective and to reaffirm that our employees ARE our company. The word, “asset,” seems so businesslike. I hope that we will always think of our coworkers as more human than an “asset.” We have friends; we’re spouses; we’re parents. And, at work, we’re a collection of nice people who make a good team.

 

In our company meetings we talk about how quickly things change in the marketplace. New technologies, new competitors and so on. But, every once in awhile, something like this accident reminds us of how quickly things can change outside of the market. And, even some introspection into what’s truly important over time. LH
We are not perfect.

But, it’s our goal to have the highest customer satisfaction in the industry. There are few companies—if any—who wouldn’t say that customer satisfaction is vital to their success. Yet, as a provider of transportation management software it’s really true. We have to develop products that help customers be successful AND we have to execute to ensure it works for them within their environment. Over the past two years, customer communication and feedback has been instrumental to the development and rollout of our current Jaguar product suite. And, because it’s extremely flexible we have to listen and work closely with our customers to understand their every requirement and business goal. That’s when the customer has the best experience—higher ROI and faster implementation.
info@transite.com
 
We have to continue this communication process long after the contract is signed and try to be flexible in order to keep customers happy. Transite now has good feedback mechanisms in place. But, nothing beats an email or phone call from a customer or the market to get our attention. If you have some thoughts on this matter, we’d love to hear them. We’re always open!
First, let’s acknowledge that Transite offers its transportation management solutions as software-as-a-service as well as a purchased, on-premise customer installation. So, the company isn’t trying to push readers away from SaaS—in fact, more than half of Transite’s customers utilize the company’s SaaS solution.

 

In today’s transportation management systems (TMS) market, companies continue to invest in transportation management software to reduce costs, improve efficiency, and help run their overall freight management functions more effectively. 

Companies can either purchase and install their TMS solution or obtain the functionality through the software as a service model—and, if they are a shipper, they can simply choose to outsource the whole thing to a third-party logistics provider.

 

SaaS TMS offerings have been advertised as inexpensive, quick to install, uncomplicated with no expensive hardware purchases, and few development costs. 

But, in spite of the positive market reception around the on-demand (SaaS) model, does it make ultimate sense for everyone?

No, it doesn't. 

Please check our website for the posting of this new paper.
We've written a white paper outlining reasons why companies should take a closer look at purchase-install solutions. 

Vested Outsourcing

01-03-2011
I just finished reading Vested Outsourcing: “Five Rules That Will Transform Outsourcing” by Kate Vitasek and want to pass along a few comments that I shared on the Amazon website.

 

This book is full of lessons-learned and it's tenets of engagement and philosophy apply to functions outside of supply chain including HR, marketing services, accounting etc. Yes, the business model for vendors is to maximize revenues/margins and the client wants to get the most services for the least amount of money. How is a mutually vested relationship possible?
 
Within our growing technology company we outsource almost everything that isn't directly in our core business. Then, in turn, we sell our products to other businesses. The practices outlined in Vested Outsourcing are making us a more valued true partner to our clients and, concurrently, is changing the way we view our selection of the vendors we use for services. A mutually beneficial model is possible! But, the C-level buy-in to this philosophy is critical, as is the communication in order to drive the desired outcomes and behaviors.

To learn more about the book click here.

We won a great new carrier customer a few months ago that has sent us on mission. In the process of understanding the customer’s benefits, they touched on some points regarding revenue generation that are important for all carriers. Since then, other carriers have also come to us to explore innovative ways to generate more revenue in a similar manner as the small package carriers, thereby generating more profit.

An area that we consistently identify as “low hanging fruit” is contract management (some of you know it as rating or freight pricing).

The process of optimal contract management is not sexy, it’s devilishly detailed and takes time to explain to senior management. It’s no wonder that it’s an area of neglect. But, more carriers are seeing that “modern” contract management enables them offer revenue-generating services to new and current customers, while squeezing every penny of profit out of every transaction.
 
The current carrier market is murky with concurrent and interrelated factors including: demand, capacities, downward pressure on pricing, and company uncertainties. It’s widely held that two years from now, many existing carriers will be out of business because they can’t keep pace with newer (and more profitable) technology and pricing initiatives.

Some companies sit on the sidelines while their competitors are revamping the fundamentals of their businesses. What will you be doing two years from now?

I know we’re biased because we’re in the Transportation Management business, but a large number of shippers and 3PLs still do not recognize the overall business value of having a robust TMS.


Here’s a quote: “You may think you’re good at picking the lowest-cost carrier. But chances are, a TMS can do it better.”

 

As much as our marketing folks would love to have thought of that line, it came directly from DC Velocity’s technology review of Transportation Management
Systems. The entire article can be found: Software that can help you make smarter moves – DC Velocity


A statistic of interest from the article: An April survey by supply chain technology provider LeanLogistics found that while 70 percent of executives believe a TMS could improve and streamline their transport procurement functions, more than 80 percent still relied on manual methods. This despite Lean’s estimate that automating the process could reduce the time companies spend identifying and selecting carriers by as much as 75 percent.

 

Transite has almost a decade in pure TMS and we love to share our knowledge and experiences. Just give us a call or email us at info@transite.com

Earlier this week, we introduced our Continental Suite of Less-Than-Truckload Rating Tools joining SMC3 and Middlewest Motor Freight Bureau as one of only three companies to offer commercial or off-the-shelf LTL rating products in the U.S.

 

Over the past months, we did a lot of research with shippers, brokers and carriers—customers, prospects and industry friends. Overall, they confirmed that there was clearly a place for a cost-effective and proven option for LTL rate services.

While we deeply respect those already in the market, we feel we have an exciting opportunity here.

 

We can afford to be affordable. We already make our money on transportation management solutions and we already have these products to support the core business. So, these sophisticated LTL products are already developed and being used on a daily basis by our customers throughout the transportation management markets, therefore we can offer proven-to-work products quickly and relatively inexpensively.

 

At Transite, we simply want to offer a sensible, high quality, low-cost alternative to the current big players.

We’ll keep you posted.

Modern TMS systems are far more flexible and open. You should be able to add components as you need them to tailor the system to the unique needs of your business– either through your own development or third-party “bolt on” components.

 

3PLs have great insight into this concept.

 

Over the past half year, we’ve gained a number of 3PL customers who were looking for transportation management technology that would enable them meet the needs of their growing business. In a crowded 3PL market, they want to create market differentiation by delivering new technology offerings to their end customers that help facilitate their end-customer’s growth and success.

 

By competing on something other than “price” and help create more client loyalty by becoming more of a strategic partner instead of a simple vendor, they are able to maintain margins, while reducing customer churn. Concurrently, they want to strengthen their own business processes so they are well-positioned as the economy strengthens.

 

One common theme in working with these customers is hearing how their business vision was limited by the capabilities of their old TMS technology. One analogy is that it’s like having restrictor plates on a NASCAR racer. You want to go fast but technology is an inhibitor.

 

We think this new breed of open, flexible technology removes such restrictions. Technology enables, not disables.

 

Email or call me if you want to discuss: geoff.comrie@transite.com